How Comparative Law Operates

Just like the name suggests, comparative law deals with the comparison of various legal systems. The law usually applies the tradition of dating back over a century to make comparisons between present and past legal systems. This form of law has enabled the globalization of trade and harmonization of laws worldwide. The comparison of laws produces results relating to the different legal cultures being assessed. It also brings a much better understanding of the foreign legal systems. Legislators often use foreign law in drafting new constitutions, showing the indispensable need for comparative law.
Comparative law has a myriad of purposes. Some of these purposes include the need to attain a deeper knowledge and understanding of the legal system in effect, to perfect the legal systems in effect and to contribute to unification of a smaller or larger scale. This practice dates back to the 18th century, although scholars had always practiced comparative methodologies such as discussing both French and English systems in determining the punishment for false witnesses. Since then, the comparative law has been used to inform many other current day fields of normativity. These fields include: jurisprudence law, international law, public law, and the private law. Check on this.

Sujit Choudhry as an Outstanding Figure in Comparative Law

Dean Choudhry is an important worldwide figure in comparative constitutional law and development. His work mainly focuses on methodological questions that are an issue of concern in comparative constitutional law. He has also written on constitution as an important tool for transitioning from violent conflict to manageable democratic politics, especially in societies that are ethnically divided. Choudhry is currently studying on transitions from authoritarian to democratic rule. He has taken part in the publication of more than seventy articles, working papers, book chapters, and reports, including The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge, 2006). Follow this link for more.

Sujit Choudhry is the founder and Faculty Director of the Centre for Constitutional Transitions, which is recognized as the first university-based center in the world responsible for mobilizing and generating knowledge to support constitutional development. He is also a member of the United Nation Mediation Roster, has been a consultant to the World Bank, and has served as a foreign constitutional expert in supporting constitutional transitions in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Sri Lanka and Nepal. In Canada, Sujit Choudhry was panelist at the Governing Toronto Advisory, which suggested major reforms to the structure of municipal government of Toronto. He also sat on the Board of Directors of the Legal Aid Ontario, one of the largest publicity funded legal assistance programs in the world. Visit them at twitter.com.

Sujit Choudhry is a Paragon of Constitutional Law

A master in the field of constitutional law, Sujit Choudhry (http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/magazine/2011/introducing-sujit-choudhry/) has founded the Center for Constitutional Transitions. The aim of his organization is to create knowledge that can be used in constitution building. This is important work because there are many countries in the world that are ethnically divided and sometimes have violent conflicts as a result. The Center for Constitutional Transitions is actively researching the topics of security sector reform, dealing with territorial cleavages, protecting democratic consolidation and preventing authoritarian backslide. Sujit Choudhry is even a member of the United Nations Mediation Roster where he lends his advice on how to handle conflicts within countries in regards to their constitutions. At one point in time, he served at the United Nations Development Program and at the World Bank Institute.

 

There are very few people who are as well respected as Sujit Choudhry when it comes to constitutional law. He has in-depth knowledge gained by visiting and researching within many countries. He has served as an advisor in constitution building in countries such as Tunisia, Ukraine, Nepal, Libya, Jordan, Egypt, South Africa, Sri Lanka and more. He has focused attention on the development of tools that help in the transition from violent conflict to peaceful democracy. Decentralization, secession, official language policy, minority rights and security are specific topics that he has extensive knowledge on. Nations around the world are eager to depend on Sujit Choudhry for expertise.

 

In recent constitutional law news, the Supreme Court of the United States is considering a case involving racial gerrymandering. Last term, they upheld the consideration of race when it comes to college admissions. Now they must consider other race-based cases when it comes to the death penalty and deliberations by jury. Redistricting has become a racial issue that the court must now address too. In December, the court will hear expert counsel from judges in North Carolina and Virginia. The issue is that these states may have engaged in unconstitutional gerrymandering. They will weigh whether or not race was used to improperly apportion 12 state House of Delegates districts. This affects just 12 out of the total 100 districts within the state. This case is just one in a long line of battles that the court must consider in regards to redistricting and race. The court does not have much flexibility when it comes to hearing these cases. The same pattern of redistricting behavior has been seen all over the United States when Republicans have been in power.